Last Updated on August 14, 2009 by FERS Disability Attorney
Federal employee attorneys create and manufacture a parallel universe of statutory interpretation, legal argumentation, case-law citations, and extrapolations from esoteric provisions in arguing the “finer points” of law. Thus, it is a temptation for the lay person — the “non-lawyer” — to attempt to borrow from cases and take a stab at citing case-law and statutory authority in trying to garner support for his or her Federal Disability Retirement application. In taking on a case at the Reconsideration Stage or the Merit Systems Protection Board, I have the opportunity to read some of the “legal arguments” which non-lawyers have attempted to make. While many such arguments are valid, some (i.e., too many) mis-cite the law, and often fail to understand and proffer the substantive import of what the cases are saying. On top of it all, I suspect that the Office of Personnel Management gets a bit annoyed when a non-lawyer applicant attempts to preach the law to another non-lawyer OPM Representative. A word to the wise: let lawyers entertain themselves in the parallel universe of the law; let the doctors render their medical opinions; let the non-lawyers make the best arguments possible, in layman’s language.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
a rational perspective from your disability claim evaluation,
a voluminous narrative can lead to suspicion in the eyes of the opm rep,
civil service disability retirement,
criterias for disability retirement opm,
describing your disability argument in plain english,
disability retirement fers,
disability retirement for federal employees,
disability retirement for nebraska's federal employees,
disability retirement usps national representation,
federal civil service disability retirement,
federal disability law blog,
federal disability retirement mspb decisions,
federal employee guide to medical retirement,
fers disability retirement eligibility issues,
fers disability tips for the layman,
fers litigation and case laws on disability benefits,
interpretation of court decisions about opm disability,
interpretation of federal disability law,
lawyer representing postal workers,
legal analysis of opm disability rulings,
legal arguments from non lawyers,
legal arguments in the federal disability application,
legal authority on opm disability retirement law,
opm administrative law and procedure,
opm case-law decisions,
OPM disability application tips,
OPM disability application tips and strategies,
opm disability case laws,
opm disability claims and benefits research,
opm disability for federal workers in alabama,
opm disability retirement blog,
opm disability secrets,
opm disability tips for non lawyers,
paying attention to the essence of a disability retirement case,
persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor,
postal service disability retirement,
resources for injured federal workers,
statutory criteria for eligibility for disability,
the applicant's legal arguments,
the non-lawyers' guide to opm disability law,
The Unrepresented OPM Disability Applicant,
tips for unrepresented opm disability applicants,
using precedents in legal arguments,
usps disability benefits,
USPS disability retirement,
when opm representative gets annoyed,
when opm representative reviews your disability application,
writing a persuasive legal analysis of your case,
writing an effective opm application memoranda