Last Updated on November 1, 2013 by FERS Disability Attorney
Coordination is something taken for granted; it is only when there is a visible lack of coordination that one comes to appreciate that which has been taken for granted. Thus, when a disjointed presentation is viewed; a play or a movie without a coherent theme; an unskilled person attempting a skill-based sport; a person trying to “wing it” when such an endeavor cannot be accomplished without prior practice and perseverance: it is the bad play which brings to the fore the importance of coordination.
Thus, for the Federal and Postal Worker who is contemplating filing for OPM Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is the disjointed application, the one without a coherent structure or lacking of the necessary connections between the primary three (3) elements: the law, the personal narrative, and the medical foundation; that is when a Federal Disability Retirement application is in trouble at the outset.
Coordinating the necessary elements will greatly enhance the chances of a successful Federal Disability Retirement application. It is when there is a lack of such coordination that the inherent inconsistencies and lack of evidentiary substantiveness will become apparent; sort of like the minor leaguer who tries to reenact the play of a major league type, only to find that it isn’t quite the same.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
a logically connected and consistent fers disability application claim,
attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the United States,
avoiding contradictions by coordinating information in the federal disability application forms,
avoiding discrepancies and inconsistencies in the federal disability retirement application,
avoiding incoherences and contradictions in the language used by the doctor and the applicant,
coherent content and information in the whole fers disability package,
comparative analysis of a fers disability application for sincerity and consistency,
consistency and verification of what the doctor says and what the patient explains in a federal disability report,
consistency in all the parts of the OPM application package,
consistency of argumentation principles key to success,
coordinating collateral issues with the advice of a federal disability retirement attorney,
coordinating content and medical information during the fers disability filing,
coordinating facts and medical conditions sf 3112,
fers disability and avoiding an artificial coordination of efforts,
how important is to coordinate medical information when applying for federal workers comp or opm disability,
logical coordination of all important forms in the opm disability packet,
making a coordinated effort to succeed through the fers disability process,
natural inconsistencies in your csrs disability claim,
not much real coordination amog federal oganizations,
one coherent federal disability retirement application,
opm disability retirement consistency,
pursuing a coherent and persuasive federal disability retirement application,
reviewing your fers disability application for consistency,
submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application,
the difference between consistency and truth in fers disability retirement,
the importance of coordination in federal disability retirement,
the incoherent federal disability application,
the life of any person (not only federal employees) is very rarely consistent,
the logical consistency of the federal disability laws in the the long run,
the supposedly perfect consistent life of a federal disability applicant,
the unrepresented applicant and a simple and consistent federal disability application,
too many inconsistencies can damage the veracity and credibility of an opm disability application,
truth and consistency across the opm disability retirement forms and statements,
USPS disability retirement