Last Updated on January 21, 2017 by FERS Disability Attorney
Whether justified or not, the conceptual interconnection between objectivity and credibility is inseparable. This general rule is no different in filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS. The appearance of objectivity naturally lends itself to credibility of an application. If too much emotional fervor is infused into an application, the credibility of the application is immediately undermined.
Now, because any discussion concerning a medical condition, the impact of a particular medical condition upon one’s ability or inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of a job; impact upon one’s personal life, etc., inherently and necessarily encapsulates an emotional perspective, does this mean that most — if not all — disability retirement applications are somewhat undermined at the outset? No, of course not.
The characterization of the application; the tone, tenor and approach, are all conveyed in the narrative of the application. This is precisely why it is often dangerous for applicant to be one and the same as the person who prepares the Federal Disability Retirement application. The subjective cannot become the objective without great effort; and few are able to expend the proper effort to effectuate the balanced tone of objectivity.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
a personal medical narrative supported by facts,
an emotional federal disability application,
an emotional vs. reasoned personal account of disability,
barriers of credibility and legal subjectivity in your opm disability application,
civil service disability,
CSRS disability retirement federal attorney,
describing a medical tragedy without too much emotionalism,
disability retirement at the USPS,
disability retirement for federal employees,
essential elements of a good medical narrative report,
federal disability attorney,
FERS disability retirement,
FERS medical retirement,
focusing on medical substantive issues not emotional problems,
getting rid of emotional baggage during fers disability application,
getting rid of emotional baggage during the opm disability application,
keeping emotions under control will help an opm disability applicant,
lack of objective medical evidence used to deny postal disability,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
legal requirements of the medical narrative report,
Maintaining an Objective Perspective in a Disability Case,
maintaining integrity in the opm medical narrative,
maintaining your emotions under control when preparing your fers disability application,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
objective medical evidence for federal disability cases,
OPM disability attorney,
OPM disability retirement,
postal service disability retirement,
presenting a personal disability matter objectively,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
representing federal employees in and outside the country,
resources for injured federal workers,
statutory requirements in OPM disability law,
the applicant's medical narrative report,
the fine balance between rational and emotional factors,
The Importance of Your Credibility in an OPM Disability Application,
using your credibility in the applicant's statement of the opm disability form,
USPS disability retirement,
when personal emotions overtake rational thoughts during application process,
writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability,
your credibility on the federal disability application
1 thought on “Medical Retirement Benefits for Federal & Postal Employees: Objectivity & Credibility”