Last Updated on June 27, 2018 by FERS Disability Attorney
What would be the difference if, in the title of Willa Cather’s novel, “Death Comes for the Archbishop”, she had instead chosen to use the word “to” in replacement of “for”? Would empires have fallen, world wars have been averted or earthquakes and other natural disasters have been delayed?
Likely, not; but would the countless minds that have encountered the novel, enjoyed its beautiful prose and admired its humanity and warmth in the telling of a tale of a time long past and a period now gone — would anyone have even noticed? Is there a difference with a distinction: “Death Comes for the Archbishop” as opposed to “Death Comes to the Archbishop”?
Some might dismissively declare, “In any event, the Archbishop died, didn’t he?” The subtlety of distinction — should it even be brought up? Would that the title was of the latter instead of the former — would anyone have even noticed? Is there a grammatical point of difference; is one “more” correct than the other?
Certainly, the “sense” that is employed exists — where, the “to” has a much more objective and distant, impersonal “feel” to it, whereas the “for” personalizes it, gives it warmth, almost as if “death” is a person as opposed to an event, and the “for” makes it a personal possessive as opposed to the “to” that connotes an arms-length relationship between the object and subject.
Are the prepositions interchangeable? If a person is stricken with grief over a tragedy and a close friend arrives to provide comfort and says, “I came for you”, it would be a statement that would be considered heart-warming. If, under the same circumstances, the person instead declared, “I came to you” — would we, again, mark the difference or even notice? It is, certainly, a statement of objective fact — the person objectively traveled and arrived at destination Point B from origination Point A.
Again, the subtle distinction — the “for” connotes a greater personal warmth as opposed to a simple statement of fact. It is, in the end, the subtle differences that sometimes makes the entirety of a distinction that makes the difference.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition, such that the medical condition prevents the Federal or Postal worker from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal job, the distinction between “to” and “for” is often the difference between living a life worthwhile and one that remains cold and impervious.
Human beings are often careless in their personal relationships; and the test of such caring or uncaring attitudes will often surface when a person is going through a trial or tragedy, and preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the complex and impersonal administrative process of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, will often test the workplace relationships because of the self-interested motives that exist with agencies and the Postal Service.
Some coworkers, supervisors and others will distance themselves immediately, and they will remain in the category of the “to” people; while other coworkers, managers, supervisors, etc., will surprisingly be there “for” you. Willa Cather chose the preposition “for” over the “to” because she was an excellent author, and it is the excellence of a human being that is revealed in the subtle differences we often overlook.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
ada and disabiliy retirement,
attorney dealing with opm,
attorney with experienced on federal disability retirement,
before the fers employee has no other choice,
benefits fers retirement for incapacity,
benefits search with regard to federal disability,
can I sue a government agency for mental conditions caused by a hostile work environment?,
csrs usps retirement for mental incapacity,
disability under fers due to incapacity after an accident with permanent damage in the leg,
dol workers comp or fers medical,
early retirement attorney for physical or mental incapacities,
employee at the gpo with separation work-related med problems,
employees benefits fers laws,
fed attorney for csrs or fers claims,
federal attorney for dod employees,
federal employment law on medical retirement benefits,
federal employment lawyer for cases of heath conditions,
federal lawyer with experience on cases of incapacitation due to a chronically disabling condition,
federal retirement lawyer specialized in cases of fed medical retirement under fers,
federal workers comp lawyers,
fers attorney for rotator cuff claims in the federal workplace,
fers federal disability benefits,
fers financial compensation,
fers medical retirement age not relevant,
fers postal retirement,
fers usps worker with physical,
fers workers should give the last bit of your health to your family and loved ones before your condition gets worse,
fighting for the rights of the disabled federal employee with administrative law attorney,
filing for fers med benefit,
gipsa government agency worker with mental problems needs attorney representation,
gov employee working in the Interpol needs attorney,
help fers retirement medical laws,
helping federal employees from any us government agency,
how many hours of leave without pay can i take before it affects my promotion,
how to exit federal government job when employee has chronic disabling condition,
ill iom want to find attorney specialized in med retirement,
impairment,
incapacity retirement for imls employee now under owcp,
injured postal employee attorney experienced with usps early out applications,
ins employee needs fers dis attorney and pronto,
irmc administrative sick leave,
irs med pension benefits lawyer ginnie fed employment and chronic health issues,
is early retirement a good deal? not so if you consider other options you may have,
legal representation for incapacitated gnma employee,
med disability from post office due to ptsd from military service,
medical fight and fers disability fight,
medically retire from government,
more fers federal disability for government employees who are not eligible for regular opm retirement,
now bionic extremity or limb alternatives after accident as a federal law enforcement agent,
opm injury retirement due to damage to extremities,
opm retirement and fers incapacity law,
opm retirement status,
opm.gov med annuity payments,
options usps impairment,
owcp dol.gov stress in the postal service,
owcp permanent incapacitation,
owcp postal retirement attorney,
owcp.gov psychiatric issues,
owcp.gov usps,
postal employee career choices,
postal employee information offer of modified assignment refusal,
postal workers choices,
protecting rights federal government employees with disabling conditions,
quitting the usps for health relating issues,
rehabilitation fers opm,
resign so you don't get any fed medical benefits?,
retiring medically from federal service with cluster headaches,
social security retirement benefits with government industrial disability,
studying the federal disability opm retirement alternative,
the usps mental disability retirement lawyer,
usps owcp,
usps owcp choices,
usps resignation due to disabling conditions,
usps retirement for federal disability,
what a fers employee can do when she or he cannot longer work due to disabling conditions,
working in a job you can physically or mentally do may be the beginning of a better life,
yes you can keep medical insurance after opm medical ret,
your options after an injury in the federal workplace