Last Updated on November 9, 2009 by FERS Disability Attorney
When a Federal or Postal employee is considering filing for Federal Disability retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, there are many and varying conflicting responses, wrapped and bundled in emotional turmoil, reactionary and concerned viewpoints, etc. Stories of a “hostile work environment”, of discriminatory actions, harassing supervisors, etc., are often part of the “narrative” of a person considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement.
One must be careful, however, that when the affirmative decision to file for disability retirement is made, that only those relevant aspects of the narrative be included in the final disability retirement packet. Things which do not provide a compelling basis for proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, the necessary criteria for meeting the legal standard to be approved for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS or, just as importantly, things which will harm a disability retirement application– they should be left out of the final narrative.
Such issues surrounding a “hostile work environment” or a harassing supervisor — such perspectives or narrative formulations which come close to the dangerous precipice of showing that one’s medical disability is merely a “situational” disability (those medical conditions which are specifically confined to a specific situation in a specific agency’s office environment) — should certainly be left out of the final narrative. This brings up a further point, which I have touched upon many times in the past: a person without an attorney to formulate the narrative in filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is often too close to his or her own case, and cannot objectively present the proper narrative to the Office of Personnel Management.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
abusive supervisors and federal disabled workers,
an emotional vs. reasoned personal account of disability,
assisting clients that have tried to file for disability without an attorney,
attempting opm disability without representation,
attorney experienced in dealing with fers disability retirement claims,
attorney representation before the office of personnel management (opm),
avoiding using the "hostile environment" term in your opm disability claim,
bullying in the postal service,
bullying postal supervisor and the injured federal employee,
cases where the opm claims situational disability,
CSRS disability retirement federal attorney,
eeoc federal employee disability claims,
emotional issues are understandable but don't let them ruin your application,
emotional turmoil at the post office,
experience and results for federal employee disability claims,
fers disability for mental problems is possible if you avoid some pitfalls,
FERS disability retirement,
focusing on medical substantive issues not emotional problems,
getting rid of emotional baggage during fers disability application,
harassment and bullying by federal government supervisors,
harassment without accountability at the USPS,
Keeping Emotionalism to a Minimum,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
one easy reason the opm can use to deny your disability claim,
opm disability for stress is possible just don't make it situational,
opm disability law and the preponderance of evidence concept,
OPM disability retirement,
opm situational disability as a landmine difficult to overcome,
postal workers disability psychiatric disability in OPM disability retirement,
preponderance of the evidence concept in fers disability law,
preponderance of the evidence documents,
psychiatric disability in OPM Disability Retirement,
representing federal employees in and outside the country,
Situational Disability and the Federal Worker,
situational disability and the hostile environment claim,
situational federal disability,
the danger of postal disability retirement for stress,
the dangers of getting your opm claim situational,
the revenge of a postal supervisor,
us postal service disability retirement,
USPS disability retirement,
when personal emotions overtake rational thoughts during application process