Last Updated on January 31, 2019 by FERS Disability Attorney
Does the former have an advantage over the latter? Our tendency is to think so — as in, “Being a thoughtful person is better than being a thoughtless person. And, in any event, it is always better to think about things than not to.”
Really? Does reality bear such a thought out, and does thinking about something as opposed to its opposite — not thinking about it — gain any advantage? Does Man’s biological advancement through evolutionary selectivity of genetic dominance necessarily favor those who engage in the activity of “thinking” over those who do not?
Take the following hypothetical: An individual must make a “serious” decision — i.e., perhaps about one’s future, career, marriage, etc. He is told to “take some time to think about it”, and does so dutifully. He speaks with others; does some reading; mulls over and “reflects” upon the issue; takes out a yellow-pad and writes the columns, “Pros” and “Cons”, and after days, weeks, perhaps even months, comes to a decision. Within a couple of years of making the decision, he realizes that he has made a fatal error.
Now, the counterexample: Same scenario, but in response, the individual says, “Naw, I don’t need to think about it. I just go on what my gut tells me.” He goes out, parties, avoids “thinking” about it, and the next morning makes that “important” decision. He remains happy with the decision made for the remainder of his life. So, the obvious query: What advantage did one have over the other, and what fruitful outcome resulted from “thought” versus “thoughtlessness”?
Yet, we persistently hear the phrase, “I should have thought about it,” or “I should have given it more thought” — always implying that, had further reflection been accorded, had additional wisdom been sought, or multiples of contemplation allowed, ergo a different result would have been achieved.
The error in the logic of such thinking is that one assumes a necessary connection between “result” and the activity of “thinking”, when in fact it is the very activity itself which retains a value in and of itself. “Thought,” “thinking” and “thoughtfulness” are activities which have a value by themselves. The satisfaction of a result-oriented, retrospective according of value based upon an outcome achieved is to place the value upon the wrong end.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who are “thinking” and engaging in “thoughts” about preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, there comes a time when a “decision” must be made. “Thoughtfulness” is an activity worth engaging in, regardless of the outcome of the activity itself.
In engaging such an activity, it may be worthwhile to seek the advice of an attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law — if only to consider the evolutionary advantages in thinking about thoughtful activities as opposed to the thoughtless decisions made by an unthinking thoughtlessness.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
a thoughtfully designed disability program which encourages federal employees to continue working and paying taxes,
air traffic controller medical retirement,
anxiety disorder postal disability,
atc fers disability retirement lawyer,
before resigning from federal government cause of failure of owcp to qualify read this blog,
burden of proof fers disability preponderance of evidence,
city letter carrier repetitive motion injuries,
clarity of thoughts in the life of a disabled federal employee,
csrs fmla long term chronic condition,
disability attorney us postal service sac ca,
disability letter from physician to federal agency employer,
dod employee mental depression disability retirement,
faa and medical disability,
feca termination of benefits,
fed agency accuses you of awol for urgent medical condition,
federal disability earnings cap is 80%,
federal disability retirement due to unreasonable accommodation,
federal employee early medical retirement 2015,
federal government medical retirement multiple sclerosis,
federal job resignation letter with reason medical,
fers disability medical report document,
fers disability retirement and working,
harassment at the post office,
how to write a detailed psychiatric report for owcp disability retirement,
implicit and explicit opm medical retirement package,
injuries owcp excepts,
it is usually no beneficial to resign while applying for fers or csrs disability retirement,
lawsuit against federal agencies discrimination for paranoia schizophrenia,
leave of absence opm,
legal assistance standard form 3112c and other medical retirement forms opm,
letter carriers and back pain,
liteblue workman compensation medical retirement,
long term illness while on federal service,
lwop for occupational injury with federal government and how to get it,
medically retiring from federal government for fibromyalgia,
mental disability thru usps (postal service),
narrative generic example or professional guideline of fers disability retirement,
non-work related injury postal service,
nurse practitioner support opm disability,
opm 3112,
opm 3112 assistance,
opm bullying policy and federal disability retirement,
opm disability form 3112,
opm disability important legal decisions,
opm disability retirement package,
opm federal disability alcoholism is it possible?,
opm hostile environmental policy and pursuing federal disability,
OPM medical retirement,
opm medical retirement processing,
opm notice of proposed removal poor performance medical issues,
opm office postal service disability,
opm options for medical retirement,
opm reassignment hostile work long term stress damage,
opm returning to work or retirement,
owcp how to file medical retirement due to a hostile work environment,
owcp lwop,
owcp narrative employee,
owcp plantar fasciitis (cash award if job related) and opm medical retirement (no job related),
owcp/voc rehab retraining expenses,
pension from opm 2nd opinion dr doctor,
postal retirement medical benefits,
psychiatrist and mental disability retirement for fed employees,
repetitive injury in postal service,
request long term disability from your dr after chronic injury off duty federal occupation,
sf 3107 & 3112 application for immediate medical retirement,
sf 3112 forms,
standard form 3112 owcp disability retirement,
standard form 3112b and 3112a,
temporary federal workers compensation approved what’s next?,
thoughtless agency actions against the disabled employee,
tips for disability retirement with the postal service,
usps long term sick leave after car accident,
when opm requests for additional medical documentation,
when sick leave is not enough for a long term medical condition in the usps,
writing an owcp case psychiatric report for ptsd,
wrongful termination do to excessing at usps when a medical condition exists
1 thought on “Federal Disability Retirement: Thought versus thoughtless”