Last Updated on October 3, 2009 by FERS Disability Attorney
Neither length nor detail constitutes legitimacy. The spectrum of the types and styles of denial letters issued by the Office of Personnel Management in Federal Disability Retirement cases under FERS & CSRS range from a short paragraph under the “Discussion Section”, to 3 – 4 pages of apparent references to doctor’s notes, reports, etc. — with a lengthy lecture about the need for “objective” medical evidence, and about how a particular medical condition “may be” treated by X, Y or Z treatment modalities.
Don’t be fooled. One may think that, because OPM provides a seemingly “detailed” explanation of why a particular disability retirement application was denied, that such lengthy detail means that it is somehow “substantive”. In fact, I often find the opposite to be true: the shorter the denial, the greater the substance. The lengthy denial letters contain “substance”, all right — but substance of the wrong kind. They contain: Mis-statements of the law; mis-statements of the criteria to be applied; inappropriate assertions of medical opinions (contrary to what one might think, the OPM representative does not normally have a medical degree, let alone a law degree), and a host of other “mis-statements”. Sometimes, the weightier the denial, the more confusing as far as how to respond. And, perhaps, that is one methodology as to how OPM wants to approach the case: If it seems long and complicated, maybe the applicant will sigh, give up, and go away. Don’t.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
cases where opm disability specialists try to create case laws,
Common OPM Excuses for Federal Disability Denials,
deficiencies of an OPM disability denial,
denial letter as part of a long disability process,
discussion section in the opm denial letter,
doctor's notes used to deny csrs disability retirement,
eligibility requirements to qualify for postal service disability,
eligibility to apply for disability retirement in federal employment,
fed employee disability benefits denied by federal government,
federal disability lawyer to handle opm disability denial,
federal opm disability lawyers in maryland,
if the opm specialist misinterprets opm disability law,
if your initial disability application was denied by the opm,
if your legitimate opm fers claim has been denied,
if your opm disability claim was unfairly denied,
Indiana fers federal government disability,
lack of objective medical evidence used to deny postal disability,
medical conditions disqualify opm disability retirement,
Minnesota employee federal opm disability retirement,
misstatements as basis for denial,
my fers disability application was denied - What's next?,
narrowing down OPM excuses for application denial,
OPM Denial Letter,
OPM Disability Specialist,
opm representative's understanding of opm disability law,
OPM unreasonable denial,
opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement,
quoted mis-statements in the opm denial letter,
reasons why the opm can deny disability application,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
representing federal employees in and outside the country,
representing us government disability employees anywhere,
sorting out the real reasons for denial when the opm denial letter is long,
The Denial at the First Stage,
the denial disability letter issued by the opm,
the dreaded denial letter,
what conditions opm will deny for retirement?,
when the opm disability specialist misstates laws,
withstanding the selective reasoning of the opm for denying a claim,
working around an opm denial letter