Last Updated on March 14, 2013 by FERS Disability Attorney
Efficacy of treatment is the goal for a doctor; and upon information that such efficacy has failed to render improvement or incremental signs of progress, many doctors lose interest, or become suspicious.
Social Security Disability, of course, requires a higher standard of proof — one of essentially “total disability”, where one is no longer able to engage in “substantially gainful activity” — and, as such, is an implicit admission of medical failure.
FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement, however, is merely an acknowledgement that there are certain medical conditions which, limited in their scope and impact, prevent a person from performing one or more of the essential elements of a particular kind of job. Such a person who goes out on Federal Disability Retirement benefits can still remain productive in the work-world, by pursuing another, different kind of vocation.
As such, from a medical point of view, conveying the distinction between the two is like the difference between identifying a hill as opposed to a mountain: both may have some elevation, but the extent and scope between the two goes well beyond a linguistic peculiarity.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Related
Tags:
a second chance to be helpful and productive,
advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application,
applying for federal disability,
civil service disability retirement,
condition that prevents to perform the essential functions,
disability retirement at the USPS,
doctor information to win a federal employee disability claim,
essential elements of jobs,
federal disability retirement is not total disability,
fers disability is not about total disability but about a permanent disabling condition that affects work,
FERS disability lawyer,
importance of following up medical disability treatment,
injured federal employees and doctors that hate paperwork,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
listing only essential medical information in the 3112,
opm disability annuitants and whether they can work part- or full-time,
opm disability retirement and the total disability concept,
OWCP disability retirement,
postal service disability retirement,
postal service unequal treatment disability,
Social Security and OPM disability relationship,
social security disability award and fers,
standard of proof applicable to opm disability retirement,
standard of proof concept in federal disability retirement,
stating the facts about the essential element of the job,
technical difference between opm disability law theory and practice,
the most complete blog on federal disability retirement,
the non-adversarial opm disability process argument - theory and practice,
USPS disability retirement benefits,
usps worker & social security disability,
what "standard of proof" applies to fers disability retirement,
when treating physicians hate administrative chores,
why some doctors won't help disabled employees,
yes you can work after getting fers disability retirement but...
I am in the process of a plying and still with my agency but have not worked for at least six months. I have no income and desperately want to go back to work but am being advised not to as this could affect my case.
How are people expected to get by. My condition is very time sensitive but with no money I cant evin fill my prescriptions or keep the power on
Is there some kind of recourse if because of the length
of this process I progress to the point of no return?