Last Updated on September 22, 2010 by FERS Disability Attorney
In filing an application for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, there is a tendency to assuming that the Federal Agency will be providing a complete, fair, impartial, and thorough review of one’s application, and that one’s disability retirement application will be applied in accordance with the law. Such a tendency to expect a certain level of competence and impartiality is certainly understandable; but the reality is far from the tendency of such expectation.
There are many factors which interfere with such expectations: the competency of the assigned OPM representative; the knowledge (or lack thereof) of the individual Representative; the caseload; and multiple other factors. Thus, when there is the false expectation that one’s Federal Disability Retirement application has been fully reviewed and the entirety of the law has been taken into consideration, there is a tendency to believe what the Office of Personnel Management has said as gospel truth. “There is insufficient objective medical evidence to…” “The MRIs failed to reveal that…” “Your doctors failed to state that…” These are all generic statements that may or may not be true, but sound like they provide a basis for a denial. Resist the tendency to believe what OPM says; ultimately, a Federal Disability Retirement application must comply with the laws which govern the administrative process, and may well have to go to an administrative judge to prove the issue.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Related
Tags:
believing on opm's excuses to deny your federal disability benefits,
civil service disability,
common excuses the opm uses to deny disability benefits,
Common OPM Excuses for Federal Disability Denials,
disability retirement at the USPS,
disability retirement for federal employees,
don't believe the excuses opm uses to deny your federal disability claim,
federal disability attorney,
federal disability law blog,
federal medical retirement benefits,
great expectations -- or at least reasonable expectations from the opm,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
no accountability with the office of personnel management,
OPM disability lawyer,
OPM disability retirement,
opm's favorite excuses to deny federal disability retirement,
OWCP disability retirement,
postal disability retirement blog,
postal service disability retirement,
quoting common excuses the opm uses to justify denial of disability benefits,
resources for injured federal workers,
the applicant's tendencies in cases of federal disability retirement,
the opm disability applicant and her false expectations,
the reality versus the expectation of the opm disability process,
the reasonable expectation that an applicant should have about opm disability retirement,
USPS disability retirement,
usps disability retirement blog,
what to do if your opm disability is denied?,
what to do when the OPM rejects application,
when opm denies your disability benefits,
when opm representative reviews your disability application
3 thoughts on “Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Resisting Tendencies”