Last Updated on January 27, 2011 by FERS Disability Attorney
There is a distinction between the existence of a legal standard and the citing of such legal standard — to include statutory references, case-law citations, etc. — and the art of persuasion. In reviewing Federal and Postal Disability Retirement applications which have been previously prepared, formulated and submitted by unrepresented Federal and Postal employees, which have been denied, it is often refreshing to see how laymen (i.e., “non-lawyers”) have utilized cases and case-law citations (often straight from some of my articles and blogs) in arguing his or her case.
The problem with such an approach, however, is that the unrepresented Federal or Postal employee will often refer to such legal standards without engaging in the necessary art of persuasion. Legal standards are certainly there to be used; however, there is a proper way and methodology of utilizing legal standards, and an improper way. The improper way is to use the legal standard as a hammer — of stating: X exists and states Y, therefore you must conclude Z. The proper methodology in utilizing a legal standard is to engage in the art of persuasion: X exists, and X determines why Y must come about, and therefore Z should be the logical conclusion, and here are the reasons why.
Normally, I advise against non-lawyers using the law precisely because of the potential mis-application of the methodology. Leave the law to lawyers; that is why lawyers are hired.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
a strategy for non-lawyers: stating the obvious instead of case-law citation,
Accepting opm disability clients all across America,
application of case laws on federal disability retirement claims,
attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the United States,
case law citation in federal disabilities cases,
civil service disability,
common mistakes unrepresented opm disability applicants often do,
different methodology for lawyers and non-lawyers in opm disability applications,
federal disability attorney,
federal disability law blog,
federal disability lawyer,
federal disability retirement lawyer,
federal employee disability,
FERS disability attorney,
filing a very persuasive federal disability application,
filing for opm disability retirement,
interpretation of case laws in cases of disability retirement for federal employees,
lawyer role in federal disability cases,
legal persuasion in the initial federal disability application,
legal services for federal and postal workers all across america,
legal standards to be met in an opm disability application,
MSPB disability attorney,
MSPB disability lawyer,
opm disability case laws,
OPM disability retirement,
owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement",
persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor,
process argumentation and the substance of the opm disability case law,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
resources for injured federal workers,
statutory legal standard of disability or impairment,
the art of persuasion in fers disability retirement law,
the non-lawyers' guide to opm disability law,
The Unrepresented OPM Disability Applicant,
tips for unrepresented opm disability applicants,
unrepresented opm disability applicants should keep applications simple,
using legal standards to win a federal disability claim,
usps disability benefits,
USPS disability retirement,
what approach should I used in filing for opm disability retirement,
when non-attorneys attempt to use case law,
writing a persuasive legal analysis of your case