Last Updated on January 11, 2022 by FERS Disability Attorney
In any denial of a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, the Office of Personnel Management incessantly refers to their 7-part criteria of eligibility, in making their determination as to the legal viability of a case.
The criteria, as stated, can be both helpful, as well as result in a negative determination, for multiple reasons. To the extent that it extrapolates and extracts from the relevant Code of Federal Regulations, it minimally states the fundamental legal requirements for eligibility of a Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
However, because such a basis only extracts from the originating statutory foundation for eligibility, what it completely ignores is the continually evolving cases which clarify, interpret and define the very terms which constitute the criteria. To that extent, OPM’s adherence to the strict and narrow application of the original “law” can often result in a negative determination, precisely because such an application ignores the subsequent clarifications which have evolved and progressed from various cases which have been litigated, both in the Federal Circuit Courts as well as at the Merit Systems Protection Board level.
Beware of the 7-part criteria; if followed, it can backfire; if not followed, it can backfire. The 7-part criteria is a Catch-22 in sheep’s clothing.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill
FERS Disability Attorney
Tags:
applying for federal disability,
criterias for disability retirement opm,
CSRS disability retirement federal attorney,
disability retirement at the USPS,
FERS disability lawyer,
fers litigation and case laws on disability benefits,
how postal employees qualify for disability,
how postal employees qualify for disability retirement,
how the office of personnel management decides who's disabled and who is not,
if the opm specialist misinterprets opm disability law,
interpretation of judge-made decisions in opm disability cases,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
misinterpretation of past opm disability cases,
misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability law,
misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability laws,
misinterpreted laws in the opm denial letter,
misstatements as basis for denial,
office of personnel management disability,
opm disability case laws,
OPM disability retirement,
opm eligibility criteria,
opm medical retirement qualification ruled by legal criteria of eligibility,
OPM Reconsideration Stage,
opm's 7-part criteria to approve disability claims,
opm's reviews for federal disability elegibility,
OWCP disability retirement,
Postal Service disability,
pragmatic methodology,
qualifying federal employees for fers disability,
statutory requirements in OPM disability law,
steps to prove disability under fers csrs laws,
talking about federal disability retirement elegibility,
the legal and medical standards the opm uses to decide who qualifies for fers disability,
understanding opm disability judge-made laws,
usps disability retirement blog,
when the opm disability specialist misstates laws,
your treating doctors
4 thoughts on “Disability Retirement for Federal Government Employees: OPM and the 7-Part Criteria”