Last Updated on July 25, 2009 by FERS Disability Attorney
A more extensive article on the recent case of Reilly v. OPM has already appeared in FedSmith.com, because it is an important step forward in Federal Disability Retirement Law. Decided July 15, 2009 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, it topples another idol of a false standard imposed by OPM: that medical documentation which is written by a doctor after a Federal or Postal employee is separated from Federal Service may be dismissed as being near-irrelevant in evaluating and reviewing a Federal disability retirement application. This has never made sense, since many medical conditions are progressive and degenerative in nature, and that is precisely what the Court in Reilly argues. “The field of forensic medicine abounds with examples of subsequent medical examinations relevant to a prior condition,” the Court in Reilly argued, citing the classic example that “inferencesabout prior intoxication can be drawn from blood alcohol tests conducted at a later time.” Further, where “proximity in time, lay testimony, or some other evidence provides the requisite link to the relevant period the subsequent evidence can be very probative of a prior disability.” Of course medical evidence gathered within the 1-year period after separation of service should be given probative value. The Court in Reilly states that principle clearly.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
Administrative Law,
atc disability retirement,
california federal disability retirement,
case law citation in federal disabilities cases,
compensation for injury illness usdoj doj employees,
CSRS disability attorney,
disability retirement fers,
disability retirement for injured Veterans Affairs employees,
disability retirement from the USPS,
doctor information to win a federal employee disability claim,
document preparation and opm disability law,
documentation for federal medical retirement,
FAA Air Traffic Controllers,
false standards in opm disability law,
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals,
federal disability law and legal argumentation,
federal disability law blog,
federal medical retirement,
FERS disability retirement,
FERS medical retirement,
guide to federal disability law,
how to file a federal workers injury claim,
importance of following up medical disability treatment,
injured postal workers,
interpretation of federal disability law,
legal representation for injured federal workers,
Medical Documentation for OPM Disability Retirement,
medical documentation guidelines,
misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability law,
MSPB Disability Retirement,
one year separated from service opm rule,
One-Year Statutory Timeframe,
opm disability representative,
OPM disability retirement,
opm medical documentation after separation,
owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement",
Post Office disability,
Postal disability retirement,
postal workers owcp rights attorney,
separated from service,
statutory requirements in OPM disability law,
Sylvia M. Reilly v. OPM,
the statutes and regulations of administrative law,
updates on opm disability medical records,
us postal service disability program,
USPS disability retirement,
when OPM creates its own laws,
workers comp federal employee
Thank you for this well reason set of comments. The VA tells me my horrible spine with 3-lower back surgeries – all of which occurred only 2-years after I retired from the Air Force, isn’t a condition they can compensate, since it didn’t impact my military service. I believe progressive spinal degeneration is the same thing that OPM decided and I hope to use your comments to convince them.
Question please: The Disabled American Veterans group told me a FERS employee who has to file for disability receives 80% the first year and then 60% for the remainder of his/her life. The FERS material shows 60% the first year, and 40% for subsequent years. Any idea where I can find something in writing – C.F.R. perhaps – showing me how disabled vets are handled differently than non-disabled vets and non-vets when they must go for disability from FERS? Thank you.