Last Updated on January 27, 2012 by FERS Disability Attorney
In most circumstances of life, the chasm and divide between language and the reality which such language is meant to reflect, is wide and irreconcilable. The problem is often that language over-states and overpowers reality.
When it comes to a medical condition, however, it is often the case that the opposite is true: language is inadequate to effectively, properly, or sufficiently describe the severity, pain, extent and scope of the medical condition being suffered. Language is meant as a tool; a conveyance in order to communicate an X as reflected in the world of Y.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important to close the expansive divide between the reality of one’s medical conditions and the words, ideas and concepts which are utilize in an attempt to communicate the experiential phenomena which one is undergoing. Suffering; mental lapses; suicidal ideations; lethargy; chronic and diffuse pain; panic attacks; such conceptual paradigms must be sufficiently conveyed by the elasticity of language.
While sympathy and empathy are not required components to evoke in an Applicant’s Statement of Disability, it is a goal to strive for. Yes, there is the legal criteria to attempt to meet in a Federal Disability Retirement application, and the objective assessment and evaluation of a Federal Disability Retirement application does not require that the Case Worker at OPM have any feelings of sympathy or empathy — but it often helps if the narrative form contains some emotive content of such evocation.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire