Last Updated on November 27, 2010 by FERS Disability Attorney
In filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, a level of objectivity in making one’s case is a goal which must always be in the purview of formulating an application. If a Federal or Postal Worker is attempting to formulate and prepare a FERS or CSRS disability retirement application without the assistance or representation of an OPM Disability Attorney, this becomes a difficult task — for the identity of the person making the affirmative argument for approval of a Federal Disability Retirement application is the same person who is describing the medical condition, the impact upon one’s Federal or Postal job, and the legal reasons why such an application under FERS or CSRS should be approved.
There are methods to avoid the appearance of “self-promotion” — a term which may not seem applicable to formulating a FERS or CSRS disability retirement application, but one which simply cannot be avoided completely. For, representation and being a proponent for one’s “cause” — however valid, and however arguably sustainable — nevertheless necessarily may imply a self-interest which engenders self-promotion. If a Federal or Postal employee insists upon formulating, preparing and submitting an application for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS without proper representation, then one’s focus should be upon an “objective” basis — what the medical reports, narratives, diagnostic tests, psychological tests, etc., reveal, and to attempt to discuss such medical documentation in an objective, independent and dispassionate manner.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
approving your opm disability retirement with an objective foundation,
avoiding the appearance of self-promotion in a federal employee disability claim,
being careful during self-representation during a federal disability claim,
civil service disability,
decisions self-represented applicants must make during the opm disability process,
disability retirement at the USPS,
do I really need a lawyer?,
federal disability application,
federal disability lawyer,
federal disability retirement for dummies,
federal employee disability,
FERS disability lawyer,
FERS disability retirement,
how a federal disability attorney can help to you to deal with a federal disability claim,
how to formulate and approach a fers disability application,
lack of objective medical evidence used to deny postal disability,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
lawyer federal retirement disability,
lawyer representing postal workers,
Maintaining an Objective Perspective in a Disability Case,
medical records in opm disability application,
MSPB disability attorney,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
objective and subjective medical evidence,
objective medical evidence for federal disability cases,
OPM Disability Application,
OPM disability application tips and strategies,
OPM disability attorney,
opm disability tips for non lawyers,
OPM First Stage Disability Application,
opm owcp strategists for a good opm disability application,
OWCP disability retirement,
presenting a personal disability matter objectively,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
statutory requirements in OPM disability law,
strategists for a good opm disability application,
the best way to formulate an usps disability retirement claim,
the non-attorney opm representative,
us postal service disability lawyers,
USPS disability retirement,
what self-represented disability applicants must know about the opm application,
when the application is viewed with suspicion
1 thought on “Federal Employee Medical Retirement: Objectivity”