Last Updated on August 31, 2012 by FERS Disability Attorney
This is a proof-based process. It is not merely a matter of completing some forms and meeting procedural guidelines in order to obtain a benefit; rather, it is an administrative process in which evidence and documentary support from third parties must be obtained in order to meet the legal criteria imposed by statute, regulation, and ever-evolving case-laws as handed down by the Administrative Judges of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, as well as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
There are administrative processes which are “entitlements”, such as certain economic assistance programs, Social Security, Medicare, etc., where one has paid into a system, and upon reaching a certain age, or meeting income-qualification criteria, etc., such procedural guidelines are merely shown, met, and approved.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, however, it is not merely a matter of meeting procedural criteria (although that, too, is required), but moreover, one must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that one is eligible, by submission of substantial and adequate documentation that one cannot perform, because of a medical condition, one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal job.
Proof is the lynchpin by which the standard of winning a Federal Disability Retirement case is won or lost. Proof is a “must”. As such, never consider filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits as merely a matter of filling out paperwork; one must prove one’s case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
Accepting opm disability clients all across America,
applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees,
asserting versus proving a federal disability retirement case,
attorney helping disabled federal employees,
attorney representing federal employees,
being eligible versus proving eligibility in opm disability retirement law and practice,
blogs owcp and opm disability issues,
building a strong disability retirement case,
disability retirement for federal employees,
Federal Disability,
federal disability law blog,
federal disability retirement,
federal disability retirement is not an automatic entitlement,
federal disability retirement lawyer,
FERS disability retirement,
fers disability retirement and the burden of proof concept,
how to prove disability in fers?,
insights to the opm proof-process,
lawyer federal retirement disability,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
opm disability legal sufficiency and proof,
OPM disability retirement,
Postal disability,
preponderance of the evidence documents,
proving eligibility on a federal disability retirement case,
proving you are eligible to medically retire from the federal government,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
standard of proof applicable to opm disability retirement,
stating facts versus proving a fers disability retirement case,
the fers disability retirement process is not just about form filling but about proving eligibility with legal/medical criteria that the application forms won't explain,
the most complete blog on federal disability retirement,
the standard of proof,
USPS disability retirement,
you may be entitled to opm disability benefits but you may not get them
1 thought on “Federal Disability Retirement: Proof”