Last Updated on August 29, 2012 by FERS Disability Attorney
One often hears about administrative procedures — that they are somehow distinguishable from court cases, EEOC proceedings, grievances, etc., in that they are “non-adversarial” procedures. Really? In designating it as such, one becomes lulled into thinking that, somehow, preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, is merely a matter of completing and submitting paperwork.
In a society which enjoys the safety of linguistic euphemisms, however, such an approach to an important application for benefits can result in devastating consequences.
Does a bureaucracy which is set up exclusively to review and potentially deny a Federal Disability Retirement application have the appearance of a non-adversarial process? Does the fact that one has a right to appeal it to the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, then to a panel of Administrative Judges for a “Full Review”, then to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, possess the scent of non-adversity?
A system which is set up with a specified statute of limitations, which employs procedural and substantive legal criteria set up to deal with appeals and submission of evidence; of a body of law which applies to determine the sufficiency of evidence; such a system is inherently adversarial in nature, and whatever words or string of words one might use to describe such a system, it is first and foremost, an adversarial process.
Treat it as such, or enter into its arena with caution and forewarning.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
administrative or adversarial process,
an easy form and the complex statutory criteria of opm disability law,
attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the United States,
choosing between an opm disability form filler lawyer and a litigation attorney,
complex issues surrounding a fers disability application,
even easy medical cases must be proved for eligibility in the opm,
Federal Disability,
federal disability retirement,
federal disability retirement attorney,
FERS disability retirement,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
lawyer federal retirement disability,
moving forward into a complex federal disability retirement process,
nationwide representation of federal employees,
opm disability is supposed to be non adversarial but....,
OPM disability retirement,
opm disability retirement is an adversarial process by its very nature,
opm disability retirement theory versus practice,
opm disability: a form filling or a legal process?,
OWCP disability retirement,
planning an opm disability strategy that goes beyond form filling,
Postal disability,
postal service disability retirement,
recognizing the complexity of the opm disability process,
representing federal employees from any us government agency,
resources for injured federal workers,
the fers disability retirement process is not just about form filling but about proving eligibility with legal/medical criteria that the application forms won't explain,
the most complete blog on federal disability retirement,
theory versus practice: if the federal disability process is only an administrative or an adversarial process,
usps disability blog,
usps disability is supposed to be administrative non adversarial procedure,
USPS disability retirement,
wrong assumptions that will spell disaster after submitting an original federal disability retirement application
1 thought on “OPM Disability Retirement: An Inherently Adversarial Process”