What constitutes “answering the question”, and more importantly, how does one determine when its opposite occurs — NOT answering the question? Does the former occur if the questioner fails to follow up, and does the latter become an issue if the person asking responds with, “That doesn’t answer my question,” or some such similar declarative assertion?
Take the following hypothetical: Person A asks Person B, “So, where do you come from?” Person B answers, “The skies of Normandy were grey on that June day in 1944.” Now, Person A could have various responses to such a statement, as in: 1. “No, no, I asked where you came from.” 2. “Are you telling me that you come from Normandy, France?” 3. “That doesn’t answer my question.” 4. Or, silence, with no follow-up.
Person B, of course, could similarly respond in variegated ways, as in: A. “I just told you.” B. “Yes” or “No” (in response to the follow-up question, “Are you telling me that you come from Normandy, France?”). C. Silence, or “Yes it does.” D. Nothing further.
It may be that Person B simply has a poetic bent, and from his perspective, the mundane query was answered in a metaphorical, literary manner. More to the point, however: Who determines if a question has been answered (leaving aside the further query of whether the answer itself has “sufficiently” or “fully” been responsive to the question) — the one who asks, or the one who answers?
In a normal conversation, of course, the issue rarely comes about; in an argument where one or the other side, or both, are trying to get answers and defeat the other side, the heat of the moment may determine the answer to the question; and the penultimate paradigm of the question, “Who determines whether the question has been answered?” occurs in the highest form during a deposition or cross-examination in the legal arena.
Observing what occurs during a court proceeding is an interesting experience of human behavior; of the back-and-forth between counsels and the witnesses being deposed or examined, as in: “You didn’t answer the question.” “Yes, I did.” “I asked you…”. “Asked and answered.” “Objection, the question has already been asked and answered.” And on and on until a singular point is pursued to an exhaustive level ad infinitum and ad nauseum.
Is the issue of what constitutes an answered question somewhat akin to the question or “original intent” — i.e., that just like an author’s original intent as to the meaning of a written document is what should rule, similarly, the person who asks the question has the sole power to determine whether or not the question asked has been answered, and moreover, adequately and sufficiently answered?
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who are beginning the process of preparing, formulating and filing an effective Federal Disability Retirement application, to be filed with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, these questions concerning the “answering of questions” will and should come to the forefront when confronted with the questions asked on SF 3112A, Applicant’s Statement of Disability.
Inasmuch as the U.S. Office of Personnel Management has promulgated the questions in a carefully-crafted manner, there are some inherent pitfalls and dangers in what constitutes an adequate response, a sufficient answer and the complete delineation that rises to the level of a satisfactory statement.
SF 3112A is replete with unanswered questions within the very substance of each question, and the answers you provide are best guided by an attorney who has had the experience of legal encounters previously, and who specializes in the Law of Federal Disability Retirement.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
can I resign from a post office position empty handed even for on- or off-duty injuries?,
considering hiring and owcp attorney or opm disability lawyer for disabling healch condition,
department of transportation employee with disabilities,
department of treasury opm disability government retirement,
dod disabled employee attorney,
dol workmans compensation pending surgery government worker,
don’t ask how to resign from the usps for an injury or illness but how you can secure your future in spite of a disabling medical condition,
experienced federal and postal medical retirement lawyer,
experienced lawyer disabled government workers,
federal civilian medical retirement for 101st Airborne Division’s government employee under the fers civilian system,
federal enforcement law official position physical exam failed for injuries off duty,
federal medical employee counseling for all civilian federal employees under fers or csrs laws,
federal retirement disability for mental illnesses government employees,
federal workers comp lawyer,
federally employee women with disabilities,
fers attorney for government and postal employees with disabling conditions,
fers postal disability application employee,
finding a good lawyer specialized in fers owcp medical disabilities,
if the rehabilitation of a disabling condition fails and the postal employee needs an attorney for postal medical retirement application,
law medical disability fers,
legal consultation with fers medical retirement lawyer,
leo disabled government employee fers lawyer,
light duty accommodation in employment with federal government agency,
limited duty fers postal worker lawyer,
long term disabilities fers medical retirement,
looking for lawyer with experience with fers and csrs medical claims,
lwop in government for medical incapacities fers lawyer,
maryland department of defense employees with disabling conditions,
medical fers options lawyer,
medical pension lawyer for fers government employee,
medically disabled government employee seeking a qualified fers disability retirement attorney,
minority government employees with disabilities,
more reflections of a fers disability retirement attorney,
need info on fers physical incapacity benefits,
noaa corps medical retirement examinations,
non-job related sickness usps attorney,
occupational injuries in government employment,
occupational injuries postal service fers lawyer,
ohio lawyer usps workers and other federal government employees,
ok city usps attorney for postal employee,
oklahoma city federal disability attorney,
on light duty injury owcp attorney,
opm medical pension annuity attorney,
opm medical pension benefits for government employees,
opm medical retirement for Washington dc government employees with disabling conditions,
opm medical retirement lawyer,
opm postal disability employee application advice from an usps medical lawyer,
opm.gov med annuity payments,
options for fers government employee with cognitive limitations,
options on medical fers pension according to usps attorney,
owcp attorney for permanent medical retirement,
owcp postal medical retirement attorney,
owcp sickness federal attorney,
owcp workmans comp federal attorney,
owcp worsening condition in federal employee needs opm disability retirement attorney,
owcp.gov medical annuity paycheck,
pennsylvania department defense civilian employee failed physical medical examination,
pension for disabling conditions fers attorney,
post office medical pension examination approval,
postal workers fers medical compensation for injuries or other disabling conditions,
qualifying for a medical retirement under fers,
rehab medical opm lawyer,
sick leave excess federal government lawyer,
signing that resignation letter from the postal service if the cause is medical inability to continue working with the usps,
the vicious cycle of pain and looking forward a better life with postal medical retirement benefits,
top lawyer for owcp employees with incapacities in the government,
unable to use firearms u.s. custom employee with physical limitations,
unable to use firearms u.s. department of defense employee with physical limitations,
usps disabilities retirements letter medical conditions attorney,
usps employee medical incapacity to continue working in the federal government,
usps resignation for permanent injury form,
virginia civilian employee searching for information on medical retirement from the us office of personnel management