Last Updated on November 27, 2013 by FERS Disability Attorney
Meeting an adequacy test may constitute sufficiency for some purposes, but not for others. Thus, it may be enough in completing an FMLA form to have a diagnosis, along with answers to other questions on WH-380-E. But mere identification of a medical condition via a diagnosis, along with a description of symptomatologies will not be enough to meet the sufficiency test in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
People often assume that having a medical condition in and of itself sufficiently explains the severity of one’s condition, and any implied “blank spaces” can be filled in by the mere existence of such a medical condition. But Federal Disability Retirement, whether under FERS or CSRS, filed through, reviewed by, and approved or disapproved by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition itself prevents the Federal or Postal employee from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s positional duties.
As such, the identification and description of a medical condition fails to comply with the adequacy standards in proving eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits. One must establish, through the conduit of a medical professional, the “nexus” or “connection” between one’s identified medical condition and the inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job.
The weight of the proof is upon the Federal or Postal applicant.
The foundation of such evidence begins with the identified medical condition, but in and of itself, it is a non-nexus — until it is squarely placed in the context of one’s official position and the duties required by one’s duties. Thus, the non-nexus become the nexus-point when combined with the identification and description of one’s positional duties.
It is this realization of the step-by-step sequence of proof which constitutes adequacy and sufficiency of evidence, and one of which the Federal or Postal applicant for OPM Disability Retirement benefits must be aware.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees,
applying for federal disability,
civil service disability retirement,
connecting legal standards and sufficiency tests,
describing all the symptoms and diagnoses of your medical conditions is something necessary to do but not enough whatsoever to get your opm disability claim approved,
describing all the symptoms of the illness,
differentiating symptoms and conditions in an opm narrative report,
disability retirement and opm standard of review,
disabling diagnosis information on narrative report,
doctors to testify in your federal disability case,
doubts about how strong your opm disability retirement application is,
essential elements of jobs,
evaluating how strong your federal disability retirement case with the adequacy and sufficiency tests,
federal employee disability,
FERS Disability,
fers disability retirement is not just about filling out standard form questions,
getting federal worker's disability benefits is not a "slam dunk",
higher legal standards used by the opm to deny disability retirement,
is the diagnosis of a medical condition enough to qualify for csrs disability?,
knowing what constitutes adequacy and sufficiency of evidence in federal disability retirement theory will help you to assess better if your claim is strong enough to pass opm own sets of scrutiny tes,
legal representation for injured federal workers,
legal sufficiency test,
making sure that you describe all the symptoms of your medical condition,
medical issues and positional duties in your federal employee disability application,
official position descriptions and medical conditions in the fers disability retirement process,
opm disability applicants that fail to provide diagnostic test results,
opm disability standards of review,
opm medical diagnosis and treatments,
pragmatic methodology,
preponderance of the evidence documents,
repetitive legal tests to opm disability law will not always yield the same results,
slam dunk case in federal disability retirement,
statutory requirements in OPM disability law,
the essence of the questions in the standard forms lead many to give insufficient information,
the positional duties that the opm will consider during the fers/csrs disabilty application,
why a formal medical diagnosis doesn't tell the whole story
1 thought on “OPM Disability Retirement: The Non-nexus”