Last Updated on September 12, 2022 by FERS Disability Attorney
20th Century Philosophy has witnessed the steady progression of deconstruction; of centuries of attempting to answer age-old questions which challenged the mind, only to be declared that it was, all throughout, the question which was the problem, and the imprecise manner of communication through language difficulties and conceptual confusions that created the unfathomable difficulties, and that therefore there are no substantive problems in philosophy to solve.
Bertrand Russell, the entire tradition of English Empiricism, and long comes Wittgenstein; and any theory of correspondence between language and the “objective” world was cast aside as being impractical, unendurable, and in the end, untrue — though, as truth itself became an empty concept, it remained a puzzle as to how such a declarative end could be proposed.
But it was ultimately the devaluing of correspondence which became most troubling; for, now, as there was and is no connection between language and reality, so an individual can do and say one thing, and be and remain another. Perhaps that is why Facebook, Twitter and electronic media are so popular; we have become who we merely declare we are.
That is often the insidious nature of a medical condition; when once it becomes known, we want to ignore it, conceal it, and think it away; but somehow the physical reality of one’s life cannot be erased so easily as words on paper, or through the use of a ‘delete’ button.
Medical conditions really do impact us; and if the Federal or Postal employee finds him/herself beset with a medical condition such that it prevents one from performing the essential elements of one’s job, then the reality of a career’s end and a change of vocation is one which is beyond mere words. But words and completing forms are what must be performed in formulating, preparing and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS or CSRS.
So, in the end, the integrity of correspondence occurs, despite what modern philosophy says — there is still, and will always be, a connection between language and reality, and that is clear and unavoidable for the Federal and Postal employee who must attempt to maneuver one’s way through the bureaucracy and administrative procedures of a Federal Disability Retirement case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Tags:
achieving effective communication during the fers disability process,
an effective written communication strategy in your fers disability claim,
applying philosophical principles to law,
assessing the impact of your injury at the postal service,
attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the United States,
cognitive dysfunctions impacting federal workers,
communication as a key component to the success of your opm disability claim,
considering the fact that standard forms don't explain what you must prove in order to become eligible for benefits,
CSRS disability retirement federal attorney,
explaining how illnesses impact your job duties,
explaining how your condition affects your work in the federal workplace,
federal disability retirement is a life-impacting issue,
federal disability standard forms won't explain the basic requirements of eligibility,
fers disability and considering the impact of several medical conditions,
FERS disability retirement,
gap between the language and reality need to be small,
health conditions that impact job performance in the federal agency,
how to explain your medical condition in your postal disability application,
job-related injuries that will impact your job security in the federal sector,
law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america,
making sure you explain what tasks of your job you can't do due to your disability,
Nexus between Medical Condition and Essential Elements,
not what medical conditions but explaining how it affects your federal job,
one more opportunity to explain nexus,
OPM disability retirement,
OWCP disability retirement,
philosophical pragmatism to the domain of opm disability law,
plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a,
repeating the same mantra: the focus is on the nexus,
the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim,
the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application,
the connection between language and reality in federal disability retirement claims: a clear explanation of how medical conditions affect specific duties in the workplace,
the federal disability retirement process is very little about oral communication and much about written communication,
the impact of a medical condition in a federal employee,
the impact of an illness in the federal employee,
the nexus between the reality of your illness and job performance must be explained in clear English,
using creative writing to explain how your medical condition affects work with the agency,
USPS disability retirement
3 thoughts on “Disability Retirement for Federal Government Employees: The Theory of Correspondence”